In the months following a ruling that determined Robin Thicke, T.I. and Pharrell Williams copied Marvin Gaye’s “Got to Give It Up” in their 2013 hit “Blurred Lines”, many have questioned how the case will affect future compositions. In speaking with The Financial Times in March, Williams said the decision “handicaps” any artist who makes something out of inspiration of a previous creation. “If we lose our freedom to be inspired, we’re going to look up one day and the entertainment industry as we know it will be frozen in litigation,” he said. Last month, British music producer Mark Ronson added an additional five writing credits to his chart-topping hit “Uptown Funk” in response to The Gap Band claiming similarities between the track…
In the months following a ruling that determined Robin Thicke, T.I. and Pharrell Williams copied Marvin Gaye’s “Got to Give It Up” in their 2013 hit “Blurred Lines”, many have questioned how the case will affect future compositions.
In speaking with The Financial Times in March, Williams said the decision “handicaps” any artist who makes something out of inspiration of a previous creation. “If we lose our freedom to be inspired, we’re going to look up one day and the entertainment industry as we know it will be frozen in litigation,” he said.
Last month, British music producer Mark Ronson added an additional five writing credits to his chart-topping hit “Uptown Funk” in response to The Gap Band claiming similarities between the track and their 1979 funk anthem “Oops, Up Side Your Head.”
So has the “Blurred Lines” case forever altered the music business for musicians? The answer, according to legendary musician-producer Nile Rodgers, is no.
“This is what we do as musicians. We listen to other people’s music, we get inspired,” Rodgers told The Huffington Post prior to performing at the annual Apollo Theater Spring Gala earlier this week. “Sometimes we do direct interpolations. And in that case, if there’s a real legal argument there, they probably should have – meaning Pharrell, T.I., and Robin [Thicke] – probably should have copy written it as an interpolation. Because yes, the intro is close, but the intro is not the song,” he added.
“If they didn’t have that intro you would not think that was a derivative of Marvin Gaye. So that would’ve been the smart move instead. I don’t know why they didn’t do that,” he said.
In addition to his work with Chic and Sister Sledge, Rodgers has crafted hits for the likes of David Bowie (“Let’s Dance”), Diana Ross (“Upside Down”), Madonna (“Like A Virgin”), and in recent years collaborating alongside Williams on Daft Punk’s “Get Lucky.”
With such an expansive collection of hits under his belt, it’s easy to consider the 62-year-old’s production credits as one of the most sampled catalogs in music.
Yet despite inspiring legions of artists, the Grammy Award winner maintains that he has no intentions of challenging any artists who have sampled his impressive repertoire of work.
“My own personal way that I look at it is, is there an artist –- and I’m not being egotistical at all –- is there an artist whose music has been sampled, or there’s variations of it, more than my music? What if I sued everybody who made a record that sounded like one of my songs,” he said. “I’ll be in court my whole life [laughs].”
“The very first time Pharrell Williams set eyes on me I was sitting at the Grammys, and he was walking down the aisle -– and he and Justin Timberlake just had a big hit record with ‘Rock Your Body,’” he recalled as he hummed the melody to the song. “I mean come on, if that’s not a derivative of ‘Good Times’… And he knew it right away. He looked at me and he bowed down.”
Rodgers is currently in the process of completing Chic’s first new album in over 20 years, “It’s About Time.” Meanwhile, he credits Kool & the Gang’s 1974 top ten hit, “Hollywood Swinging” for inspiring him as an musician to create Chic’s number one single, “Good Times.”
“If I didn’t love Kool & the Gang, I would’ve never wrote ‘Good Times,’” he said. “Kool & the Gang did ‘Hollywood Swinging.’ We all do that. That’s music and that’s progress. And that’s how songs and motifs, and licks, and ideas evolve. This is a natural thing.”
“Every now and then somebody sues somebody over something because it’s either very close to it or they feel the person has ripped them off, or they just want to make money,” he continued. “I don’t know what the motive is in this particular [“Blurred Lines”] case, but I don’t think it’s going to have a long lasting effect on the business.”
— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.
Continued:
Nile Rodgers On How The ‘Blurred Lines’ Case Will Affect The Music Business